RENAISSANCE ACADEMY CHARTER-ARTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

67

43%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

105

45%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

28

33%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

46

35%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

39

54%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

59

57%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

56

47%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

89

52%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

53

39%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

75

38%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

30

83%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

63

44%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

101

47%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

100

45%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.