Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH BRONX EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

100

32%

LEVEL 2

135

43%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

113

35%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

56

45%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

72

38%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

65

34%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

32

32%

LEVEL 2

46

46%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

66

31%

LEVEL 2

86

41%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

101

43%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

41

49%

LEVEL 2

34

41%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

59

65%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

78
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

117

42%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

92

31%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

18

46%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

21

72%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

12

60%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

96

32%

LEVEL 2

123

42%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

104

35%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

88

31%

LEVEL 2

119

42%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

16

46%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.