ACHIEVEMENT FIRST LINDEN CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

75

42%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

102

37%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

40

47%

LEVEL 4

20

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

48

35%

LEVEL 4

40

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

41

45%

LEVEL 3

35

38%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

54

40%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

84
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

62

41%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

122
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

81

38%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

12

52%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

68

44%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

87

37%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

13

57%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

15

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

11

46%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

64

42%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

90
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

69

44%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.