Skip to Content
Main content

BEDFORD PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

32

49%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

18

62%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

26

42%

LEVEL 3

24

39%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

21

48%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

38

42%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

30

57%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

42

40%

LEVEL 3

41

39%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

33
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

27

61%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

40

42%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

18

51%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

8

67%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

24

45%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

46

41%

LEVEL 3

35

32%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

11

21%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

28

53%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

42
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

19

19%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

31

31%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.