CITY KNOLL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

44

27%

LEVEL 2

68

42%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

22

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

13

17%

LEVEL 2

30

39%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

38

38%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

31

36%

LEVEL 2

38

44%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

19

48%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

30

28%

LEVEL 2

44

42%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

28

30%

LEVEL 2

40

43%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

21

38%

LEVEL 2

26

46%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

19

41%

LEVEL 2

23

50%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

61

42%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

12

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

15

52%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

45

29%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

58
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

53

41%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.