HAMILTON GRANGE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

81

29%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

32

26%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

43

31%

LEVEL 2

62

45%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

49

31%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

13

42%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

65

28%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

44

22%

LEVEL 2

80

39%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

24

51%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

31

57%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

77
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

85

43%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

99
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

34

62%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

38

69%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

12

44%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

80

32%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

56

26%

LEVEL 2

86

41%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

82
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.