HIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

97

33%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

107

33%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

37

27%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

60

38%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

19

40%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

21

44%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

73

32%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

81
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

80

32%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

35

59%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

33

58%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

73

27%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

101
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

76

27%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

24

89%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

31

82%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

98

33%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

83
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

87

32%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

94
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

94

33%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.