Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ACA GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

67

22%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

32

33%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

108
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

111
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

20

59%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

20

51%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

119
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

115

39%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

21

37%

LEVEL 3

19

33%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

24

37%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

65

34%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

93

39%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.