ATMOSPHERE ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

108

26%

LEVEL 2

146

36%

LEVEL 3

107

26%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

83

21%

LEVEL 2

143

36%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

75

36%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

71

35%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

30

42%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

122
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

88

28%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

137
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

46

47%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

37

46%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

150
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

170
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

67

19%

LEVEL 2

120

34%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

30

59%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

23

52%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

11

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

9

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

99

27%

LEVEL 2

137

37%

LEVEL 3

96

26%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

133

36%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

143
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

130

35%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.