BROOKLYN PROSPECT CHARTER-CSD 13 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

131

40%

LEVEL 4

100

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

358
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

95

19%

LEVEL 3

196

40%

LEVEL 4

162

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

60

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

186
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

40

17%

LEVEL 3

99

42%

LEVEL 4

87

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

70

43%

LEVEL 4

40

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

97

38%

LEVEL 4

75

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

13

50%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

33
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

18

47%

LEVEL 4

15

39%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

14

64%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

55

46%

LEVEL 4

51

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

69

39%

LEVEL 4

87

49%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

66
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

104
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

77

44%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

13

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

25

34%

LEVEL 4

16

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

123

42%

LEVEL 4

98

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

72

17%

LEVEL 3

178

42%

LEVEL 4

158

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

17

49%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

22

33%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

18

27%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

358
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

94

19%

LEVEL 3

196

40%

LEVEL 4

162

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

92

42%

LEVEL 4

82

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

278
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

38

12%

LEVEL 3

139

43%

LEVEL 4

139

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

39

36%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

227
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

127

40%

LEVEL 4

100

32%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.