Skip to Content
Main content

EAST LOWER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

172

59%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

179

58%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

59

49%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

67

52%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

113

66%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

112

62%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

101

62%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

99

60%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

50

59%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

65

63%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

147

57%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

144

55%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

35

76%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

134

54%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

31
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

154

55%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

38

93%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

25

83%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

14

34%

LEVEL 2

18

44%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

157

61%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

165

62%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

165

59%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

164

57%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

15

79%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.