WEST END SECONDARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

116

37%

LEVEL 4

143

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

36

12%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

141

49%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

71

40%

LEVEL 4

91

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

81

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

52

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

46

35%

LEVEL 4

60

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

7

64%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

12

46%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

8

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

112

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

108

57%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

20

39%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

25

49%

LEVEL 4

14

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

26

10%

LEVEL 3

98

39%

LEVEL 4

127

51%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

22

9%

LEVEL 3

81

35%

LEVEL 4

124

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

16

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

17

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

224
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

31

12%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

133

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

28

12%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

118

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

25

49%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

23

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

254
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

40

13%

LEVEL 3

113

38%

LEVEL 4

141

47%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

237
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

34

12%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

139

49%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.