Skip to Content
Main content

ALBANY COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,805
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,597

LEVEL 1

5,369

31%

LEVEL 2

6,423

37%

LEVEL 3

3,866

22%

LEVEL 4

1,939

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,566
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,499

LEVEL 1

4,735

29%

LEVEL 2

5,198

32%

LEVEL 3

4,043

25%

LEVEL 4

2,523

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,827
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,646

LEVEL 1

2,552

30%

LEVEL 2

3,267

38%

LEVEL 3

1,940

22%

LEVEL 4

887

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,294
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,179

LEVEL 1

2,262

28%

LEVEL 2

2,623

32%

LEVEL 3

2,040

25%

LEVEL 4

1,254

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,978
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,951

LEVEL 1

2,817

31%

LEVEL 2

3,156

35%

LEVEL 3

1,926

22%

LEVEL 4

1,052

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,272
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,320

LEVEL 1

2,473

30%

LEVEL 2

2,575

31%

LEVEL 3

2,003

24%

LEVEL 4

1,269

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

98
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

165

40%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

57

14%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

161
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

169

34%

LEVEL 2

171

34%

LEVEL 3

91

18%

LEVEL 4

70

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

758
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,322

LEVEL 1

202

15%

LEVEL 2

362

27%

LEVEL 3

367

28%

LEVEL 4

391

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

764
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,286

LEVEL 1

196

15%

LEVEL 2

326

25%

LEVEL 3

318

25%

LEVEL 4

446

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4,325
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,818

LEVEL 1

2,414

22%

LEVEL 2

4,079

38%

LEVEL 3

2,938

27%

LEVEL 4

1,387

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4,744
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,813

LEVEL 1

1,857

19%

LEVEL 2

3,212

33%

LEVEL 3

2,972

30%

LEVEL 4

1,772

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

447
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,836

LEVEL 1

1,990

52%

LEVEL 2

1,399

36%

LEVEL 3

367

10%

LEVEL 4

80

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

637
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,666

LEVEL 1

1,918

52%

LEVEL 2

1,111

30%

LEVEL 3

481

13%

LEVEL 4

156

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

174
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,181

LEVEL 1

586

50%

LEVEL 2

421

36%

LEVEL 3

134

11%

LEVEL 4

40

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

252
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,204

LEVEL 1

581

48%

LEVEL 2

371

31%

LEVEL 3

173

14%

LEVEL 4

79

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,626
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,268

LEVEL 1

3,740

24%

LEVEL 2

5,902

39%

LEVEL 3

3,734

24%

LEVEL 4

1,892

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,312
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,303

LEVEL 1

3,295

23%

LEVEL 2

4,696

33%

LEVEL 3

3,846

27%

LEVEL 4

2,466

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

179
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,329

LEVEL 1

1,629

70%

LEVEL 2

521

22%

LEVEL 3

132

6%

LEVEL 4

47

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

254
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,196

LEVEL 1

1,440

66%

LEVEL 2

502

23%

LEVEL 3

197

9%

LEVEL 4

57

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,712
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,116

LEVEL 1

5,116

30%

LEVEL 2

6,288

37%

LEVEL 3

3,806

22%

LEVEL 4

1,906

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,473
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,989

LEVEL 1

4,451

28%

LEVEL 2

5,065

32%

LEVEL 3

3,988

25%

LEVEL 4

2,485

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

253

53%

LEVEL 2

135

28%

LEVEL 3

60

12%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

284

56%

LEVEL 2

133

26%

LEVEL 3

55

11%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,864
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,631

LEVEL 1

1,891

18%

LEVEL 2

3,876

36%

LEVEL 3

3,133

29%

LEVEL 4

1,731

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,278
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,791

LEVEL 1

1,458

15%

LEVEL 2

3,055

31%

LEVEL 3

3,082

31%

LEVEL 4

2,196

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

941
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,966

LEVEL 1

3,478

50%

LEVEL 2

2,547

37%

LEVEL 3

733

11%

LEVEL 4

208

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,288
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,708

LEVEL 1

3,277

49%

LEVEL 2

2,143

32%

LEVEL 3

961

14%

LEVEL 4

327

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

6,564
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,489

LEVEL 1

4,731

29%

LEVEL 2

5,194

31%

LEVEL 3

4,043

25%

LEVEL 4

2,521

15%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.