Skip to Content
Main content

DUTCHESS COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,183
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,322

LEVEL 1

6,496

34%

LEVEL 2

7,643

40%

LEVEL 3

3,808

20%

LEVEL 4

1,375

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,265
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,608

LEVEL 1

5,376

32%

LEVEL 2

5,967

36%

LEVEL 3

3,498

21%

LEVEL 4

1,767

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,476
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,456

LEVEL 1

3,056

32%

LEVEL 2

3,924

41%

LEVEL 3

1,873

20%

LEVEL 4

603

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,546
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,087

LEVEL 1

2,487

31%

LEVEL 2

3,054

38%

LEVEL 3

1,740

22%

LEVEL 4

806

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,707
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,866

LEVEL 1

3,440

35%

LEVEL 2

3,719

38%

LEVEL 3

1,935

20%

LEVEL 4

772

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,719
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,521

LEVEL 1

2,889

34%

LEVEL 2

2,913

34%

LEVEL 3

1,758

21%

LEVEL 4

961

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

120

41%

LEVEL 2

115

39%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

74
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

126

39%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

499
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 785

LEVEL 1

93

12%

LEVEL 2

193

25%

LEVEL 3

261

33%

LEVEL 4

238

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

419
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

65

10%

LEVEL 2

153

24%

LEVEL 3

201

32%

LEVEL 4

218

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4,034
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,114

LEVEL 1

3,577

27%

LEVEL 2

5,503

42%

LEVEL 3

3,009

23%

LEVEL 4

1,025

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4,036
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,839

LEVEL 1

2,727

25%

LEVEL 2

4,076

38%

LEVEL 3

2,691

25%

LEVEL 4

1,345

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

216
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,452

LEVEL 1

1,454

59%

LEVEL 2

782

32%

LEVEL 3

183

7%

LEVEL 4

33

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

238
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,209

LEVEL 1

1,314

59%

LEVEL 2

657

30%

LEVEL 3

186

8%

LEVEL 4

52

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

366
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,650

LEVEL 1

1,242

47%

LEVEL 2

1,042

39%

LEVEL 3

305

12%

LEVEL 4

61

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

493
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,583

LEVEL 1

1,137

44%

LEVEL 2

953

37%

LEVEL 3

371

14%

LEVEL 4

122

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,071
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,383

LEVEL 1

4,204

26%

LEVEL 2

7,108

43%

LEVEL 3

3,717

23%

LEVEL 4

1,354

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,116
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,978

LEVEL 1

3,387

24%

LEVEL 2

5,475

39%

LEVEL 3

3,388

24%

LEVEL 4

1,728

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

112
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,939

LEVEL 1

2,292

78%

LEVEL 2

535

18%

LEVEL 3

91

3%

LEVEL 4

21

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

149
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,630

LEVEL 1

1,989

76%

LEVEL 2

492

19%

LEVEL 3

110

4%

LEVEL 4

39

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,169
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,876

LEVEL 1

6,133

32%

LEVEL 2

7,574

40%

LEVEL 3

3,795

20%

LEVEL 4

1,374

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,239
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,176

LEVEL 1

5,042

31%

LEVEL 2

5,895

36%

LEVEL 3

3,478

22%

LEVEL 4

1,761

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

363

81%

LEVEL 2

69

15%

LEVEL 3

13

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

26
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

334

77%

LEVEL 2

72

17%

LEVEL 3

20

5%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,461
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,775

LEVEL 1

3,018

24%

LEVEL 2

5,296

41%

LEVEL 3

3,209

25%

LEVEL 4

1,252

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,387
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,637

LEVEL 1

2,307

22%

LEVEL 2

3,943

37%

LEVEL 3

2,837

27%

LEVEL 4

1,550

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

722
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,547

LEVEL 1

3,478

53%

LEVEL 2

2,347

36%

LEVEL 3

599

9%

LEVEL 4

123

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

878
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,971

LEVEL 1

3,069

51%

LEVEL 2

2,024

34%

LEVEL 3

661

11%

LEVEL 4

217

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

5,183
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,303

LEVEL 1

6,481

34%

LEVEL 2

7,639

40%

LEVEL 3

3,808

20%

LEVEL 4

1,375

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

5,265
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,586

LEVEL 1

5,363

32%

LEVEL 2

5,958

36%

LEVEL 3

3,498

21%

LEVEL 4

1,767

11%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

15

79%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.