Skip to Content
Main content

ROCKLAND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,504
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,325

LEVEL 1

5,218

28%

LEVEL 2

6,603

36%

LEVEL 3

4,422

24%

LEVEL 4

2,082

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,939
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,717

LEVEL 1

4,526

27%

LEVEL 2

5,252

31%

LEVEL 3

4,269

26%

LEVEL 4

2,670

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,123
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,899

LEVEL 1

2,454

28%

LEVEL 2

3,322

37%

LEVEL 3

2,189

25%

LEVEL 4

934

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,341
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,019

LEVEL 1

2,077

26%

LEVEL 2

2,601

32%

LEVEL 3

2,112

26%

LEVEL 4

1,229

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,381
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,426

LEVEL 1

2,764

29%

LEVEL 2

3,281

35%

LEVEL 3

2,233

24%

LEVEL 4

1,148

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,598
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,698

LEVEL 1

2,449

28%

LEVEL 2

2,651

30%

LEVEL 3

2,157

25%

LEVEL 4

1,441

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

83
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

104
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

50

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

17

55%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

894
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,527

LEVEL 1

181

12%

LEVEL 2

452

30%

LEVEL 3

513

34%

LEVEL 4

381

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

862
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,353

LEVEL 1

155

11%

LEVEL 2

336

25%

LEVEL 3

425

31%

LEVEL 4

437

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4,415
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,385

LEVEL 1

1,448

15%

LEVEL 2

3,522

38%

LEVEL 3

2,969

32%

LEVEL 4

1,446

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4,445
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,886

LEVEL 1

1,026

13%

LEVEL 2

2,415

31%

LEVEL 3

2,646

34%

LEVEL 4

1,799

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

361
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,686

LEVEL 1

1,373

51%

LEVEL 2

952

35%

LEVEL 3

288

11%

LEVEL 4

73

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

477
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,542

LEVEL 1

1,231

48%

LEVEL 2

834

33%

LEVEL 3

350

14%

LEVEL 4

127

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

748
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,493

LEVEL 1

2,167

48%

LEVEL 2

1,578

35%

LEVEL 3

591

13%

LEVEL 4

157

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,047
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,698

LEVEL 1

2,064

44%

LEVEL 2

1,587

34%

LEVEL 3

790

17%

LEVEL 4

257

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,316
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,602

LEVEL 1

3,316

21%

LEVEL 2

5,970

38%

LEVEL 3

4,268

27%

LEVEL 4

2,048

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,696
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,020

LEVEL 1

2,734

20%

LEVEL 2

4,590

33%

LEVEL 3

4,083

29%

LEVEL 4

2,613

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

188
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,723

LEVEL 1

1,902

70%

LEVEL 2

633

23%

LEVEL 3

154

6%

LEVEL 4

34

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

243
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,697

LEVEL 1

1,792

66%

LEVEL 2

662

25%

LEVEL 3

186

7%

LEVEL 4

57

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,465
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,048

LEVEL 1

4,182

25%

LEVEL 2

6,401

38%

LEVEL 3

4,387

26%

LEVEL 4

2,078

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,888
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,396

LEVEL 1

3,458

22%

LEVEL 2

5,050

33%

LEVEL 3

4,229

27%

LEVEL 4

2,659

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

39
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,277

LEVEL 1

1,036

81%

LEVEL 2

202

16%

LEVEL 3

35

3%

LEVEL 4

4

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,321

LEVEL 1

1,068

81%

LEVEL 2

202

15%

LEVEL 3

40

3%

LEVEL 4

11

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,730
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,469

LEVEL 1

2,121

17%

LEVEL 2

4,618

37%

LEVEL 3

3,807

31%

LEVEL 4

1,923

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,790
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,594

LEVEL 1

1,521

14%

LEVEL 2

3,283

31%

LEVEL 3

3,399

32%

LEVEL 4

2,391

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

774
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,856

LEVEL 1

3,097

53%

LEVEL 2

1,985

34%

LEVEL 3

615

11%

LEVEL 4

159

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,149
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,123

LEVEL 1

3,005

49%

LEVEL 2

1,969

32%

LEVEL 3

870

14%

LEVEL 4

279

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.