SCHUYLER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 856

LEVEL 1

328

38%

LEVEL 2

359

42%

LEVEL 3

138

16%

LEVEL 4

31

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 791

LEVEL 1

272

34%

LEVEL 2

326

41%

LEVEL 3

143

18%

LEVEL 4

50

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

166

39%

LEVEL 2

183

43%

LEVEL 3

66

15%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

134

34%

LEVEL 2

164

42%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

162

38%

LEVEL 2

176

41%

LEVEL 3

72

17%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

138

35%

LEVEL 2

162

41%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

8

67%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 796

LEVEL 1

309

39%

LEVEL 2

332

42%

LEVEL 3

128

16%

LEVEL 4

27

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

256

35%

LEVEL 2

304

41%

LEVEL 3

136

18%

LEVEL 4

43

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

232

32%

LEVEL 2

334

46%

LEVEL 3

137

19%

LEVEL 4

31

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

172

26%

LEVEL 2

302

46%

LEVEL 3

139

21%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

96

79%

LEVEL 2

25

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

100

78%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

141

29%

LEVEL 2

213

44%

LEVEL 3

106

22%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

98

25%

LEVEL 2

166

43%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

187

50%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

174

43%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

53

13%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.