Skip to Content
Main content

NYC PUBLIC SCHOOLS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

NYC Public Schools Data include data for all NYC geographic districts (excluding NYC charter school data).

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124,891
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 420,300

LEVEL 1

153,862

37%

LEVEL 2

141,547

34%

LEVEL 3

77,608

18%

LEVEL 4

47,283

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139,421
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 406,489

LEVEL 1

137,491

34%

LEVEL 2

129,577

32%

LEVEL 3

81,631

20%

LEVEL 4

57,790

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61,545
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 204,652

LEVEL 1

71,748

35%

LEVEL 2

71,359

35%

LEVEL 3

38,898

19%

LEVEL 4

22,647

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69,391
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 197,190

LEVEL 1

63,098

32%

LEVEL 2

64,701

33%

LEVEL 3

41,113

21%

LEVEL 4

28,278

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63,346
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 215,648

LEVEL 1

82,114

38%

LEVEL 2

70,188

33%

LEVEL 3

38,710

18%

LEVEL 4

24,636

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70,030
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 209,299

LEVEL 1

74,393

36%

LEVEL 2

64,876

31%

LEVEL 3

40,518

19%

LEVEL 4

29,512

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

716
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,305

LEVEL 1

241

18%

LEVEL 2

348

27%

LEVEL 3

353

27%

LEVEL 4

363

28%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1,095
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,821

LEVEL 1

307

17%

LEVEL 2

419

23%

LEVEL 3

497

27%

LEVEL 4

598

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

732
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,580

LEVEL 1

950

37%

LEVEL 2

898

35%

LEVEL 3

492

19%

LEVEL 4

240

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1,072
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,118

LEVEL 1

1,020

33%

LEVEL 2

1,026

33%

LEVEL 3

630

20%

LEVEL 4

442

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41,858
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 68,673

LEVEL 1

8,623

13%

LEVEL 2

18,192

26%

LEVEL 3

20,500

30%

LEVEL 4

21,358

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43,590
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 66,005

LEVEL 1

7,347

11%

LEVEL 2

15,068

23%

LEVEL 3

19,499

30%

LEVEL 4

24,091

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32,653
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 64,967

LEVEL 1

11,348

17%

LEVEL 2

20,966

32%

LEVEL 3

18,591

29%

LEVEL 4

14,062

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35,328
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 63,102

LEVEL 1

9,820

16%

LEVEL 2

17,954

28%

LEVEL 3

18,554

29%

LEVEL 4

16,774

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17,208
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 112,261

LEVEL 1

56,386

50%

LEVEL 2

38,667

34%

LEVEL 3

13,429

12%

LEVEL 4

3,779

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19,387
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 104,377

LEVEL 1

49,487

47%

LEVEL 2

35,503

34%

LEVEL 3

14,262

14%

LEVEL 4

5,125

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31,724
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 170,514

LEVEL 1

76,314

45%

LEVEL 2

62,476

37%

LEVEL 3

24,243

14%

LEVEL 4

7,481

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38,949
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 168,066

LEVEL 1

69,510

41%

LEVEL 2

59,607

35%

LEVEL 3

28,189

17%

LEVEL 4

10,760

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118,703
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 344,201

LEVEL 1

102,306

30%

LEVEL 2

123,192

36%

LEVEL 3

72,886

21%

LEVEL 4

45,817

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130,128
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 321,379

LEVEL 1

83,228

26%

LEVEL 2

108,023

34%

LEVEL 3

74,819

23%

LEVEL 4

55,309

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6,188
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 76,099

LEVEL 1

51,556

68%

LEVEL 2

18,355

24%

LEVEL 3

4,722

6%

LEVEL 4

1,466

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9,293
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 85,110

LEVEL 1

54,263

64%

LEVEL 2

21,554

25%

LEVEL 3

6,812

8%

LEVEL 4

2,481

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

118,142
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 361,145

LEVEL 1

117,461

33%

LEVEL 2

125,542

35%

LEVEL 3

72,529

20%

LEVEL 4

45,613

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

131,475
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 349,932

LEVEL 1

104,263

30%

LEVEL 2

114,194

33%

LEVEL 3

75,961

22%

LEVEL 4

55,514

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,749
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 59,155

LEVEL 1

36,401

62%

LEVEL 2

16,005

27%

LEVEL 3

5,079

9%

LEVEL 4

1,670

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,946
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 56,557

LEVEL 1

33,228

59%

LEVEL 2

15,383

27%

LEVEL 3

5,670

10%

LEVEL 4

2,276

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38,166
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 71,307

LEVEL 1

12,752

18%

LEVEL 2

20,389

29%

LEVEL 3

19,673

28%

LEVEL 4

18,493

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39,673
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 68,276

LEVEL 1

11,133

16%

LEVEL 2

17,470

26%

LEVEL 3

18,725

27%

LEVEL 4

20,948

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86,725
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 348,993

LEVEL 1

141,110

40%

LEVEL 2

121,158

35%

LEVEL 3

57,935

17%

LEVEL 4

28,790

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99,748
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 338,213

LEVEL 1

126,358

37%

LEVEL 2

112,107

33%

LEVEL 3

62,906

19%

LEVEL 4

36,842

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.