EAST BLOOMFIELD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

93

21%

LEVEL 2

165

38%

LEVEL 3

117

27%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

85

23%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

38

22%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

86

21%

LEVEL 2

159

38%

LEVEL 3

114

27%

LEVEL 4

57

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

155

41%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

76

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

47

78%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

47

85%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

67

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

23

29%

LEVEL 2

42

53%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

47

42%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.