RED CREEK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

133

31%

LEVEL 2

161

38%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

107

28%

LEVEL 2

151

39%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

61

32%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

66

30%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

125

31%

LEVEL 2

155

38%

LEVEL 3

93

23%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

101

27%

LEVEL 2

147

40%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

143

42%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

134

44%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

64

76%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

56

74%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

101

42%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

76

35%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.