Skip to Content
Main content

FORT EDWARD UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

63

26%

LEVEL 2

112

46%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

31

27%

LEVEL 2

54

47%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

38

35%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

32

25%

LEVEL 2

58

45%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

26

26%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

61

26%

LEVEL 2

104

45%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

61

31%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

102

46%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

66

37%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

22

76%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

49

43%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

32

37%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

41

32%

LEVEL 2

63

49%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

49

40%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.