Skip to Content
Main content

GRANVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

215

43%

LEVEL 2

199

40%

LEVEL 3

76

15%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

160

35%

LEVEL 2

172

37%

LEVEL 3

90

20%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

98

43%

LEVEL 2

96

42%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

69

33%

LEVEL 2

84

41%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

117

43%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

91

36%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

208

43%

LEVEL 2

195

40%

LEVEL 3

74

15%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

154

35%

LEVEL 2

165

37%

LEVEL 3

88

20%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

131

33%

LEVEL 2

185

46%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

153

43%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

84

83%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

75

73%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

92

35%

LEVEL 2

106

41%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

93

39%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

123

51%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

91

41%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.