HADLEY-LUZERNE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

130

37%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

111

37%

LEVEL 2

125

42%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

78

46%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

50

36%

LEVEL 2

62

44%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

75

41%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

61

38%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

126

37%

LEVEL 2

131

38%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

109

37%

LEVEL 2

122

42%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

93

31%

LEVEL 2

127

42%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

81

31%

LEVEL 2

120

46%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

37

80%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

30

83%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

59

47%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

92

46%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

86

49%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.