Skip to Content
Main content

LAKE GEORGE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

123

29%

LEVEL 2

190

44%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

75

18%

LEVEL 2

147

36%

LEVEL 3

123

30%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

57

28%

LEVEL 2

92

46%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

66

29%

LEVEL 2

98

43%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

110

28%

LEVEL 2

179

45%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

69

18%

LEVEL 2

135

35%

LEVEL 3

120

31%

LEVEL 4

61

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

86

23%

LEVEL 2

180

48%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

37

74%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

27

54%

LEVEL 2

21

42%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

76

23%

LEVEL 2

157

47%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

47

49%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

32

34%

LEVEL 2

38

40%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.