Skip to Content
Main content

RUSSELL I DOIG MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

117

36%

LEVEL 2

138

42%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

88

32%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

43

27%

LEVEL 2

77

48%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

34

27%

LEVEL 2

54

43%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

74

44%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

54

36%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

102

34%

LEVEL 2

133

44%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

74

29%

LEVEL 2

105

41%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

74

27%

LEVEL 2

132

47%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

102

44%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

43

86%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

36

77%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

95

46%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

68

57%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

44

49%

LEVEL 2

38

42%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.