Skip to Content
Main content

NEWFIELD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

134

37%

LEVEL 2

160

45%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

132

40%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

59

37%

LEVEL 2

69

44%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

56

37%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

75

37%

LEVEL 2

91

45%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

76

42%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

142

44%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

117

39%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

13

62%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

143

52%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

63

25%

LEVEL 2

111

44%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

67

78%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

69

85%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

74

52%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

39

30%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

103

48%

LEVEL 2

86

40%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

93

46%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.