Skip to Content
Main content

DRYDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

170

43%

LEVEL 2

155

39%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

153

43%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

54

15%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

89

46%

LEVEL 2

74

38%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

69

41%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

81

39%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

84

44%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

154

41%

LEVEL 2

147

39%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

141

42%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

110

34%

LEVEL 2

143

44%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

90

31%

LEVEL 2

130

45%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

60

83%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

63

89%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

86

43%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

117

59%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

102

57%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

167

42%

LEVEL 2

153

39%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.