Skip to Content
Main content

CANDOR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

173

49%

LEVEL 2

147

42%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

126

40%

LEVEL 2

145

46%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

89

48%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

63

39%

LEVEL 2

78

48%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

84

50%

LEVEL 2

69

41%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

63

41%

LEVEL 2

67

44%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

157

48%

LEVEL 2

138

42%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

110

38%

LEVEL 2

134

47%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

131

43%

LEVEL 2

143

47%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

95

34%

LEVEL 2

136

49%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

42

91%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

31

76%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

77

41%

LEVEL 2

86

46%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

80

51%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

96

58%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

84

52%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.