HAMPTON BAYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

107

33%

LEVEL 2

131

41%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

66

42%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

58

39%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

49

28%

LEVEL 2

71

41%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

63

39%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

59

42%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

79

52%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

77

45%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

97

33%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

129

44%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

26

81%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

24

89%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

70

27%

LEVEL 2

104

40%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

113

44%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

53

84%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

48

71%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

83

53%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

57

45%

LEVEL 2

53

42%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.