Skip to Content
Main content

NESAQUAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

106

14%

LEVEL 2

358

46%

LEVEL 3

241

31%

LEVEL 4

73

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

78

14%

LEVEL 2

242

44%

LEVEL 3

172

31%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

189

48%

LEVEL 3

114

29%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

45

17%

LEVEL 2

124

46%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

168
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

169

44%

LEVEL 3

127

33%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

118

42%

LEVEL 3

94

34%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

294
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

96

13%

LEVEL 2

330

46%

LEVEL 3

227

32%

LEVEL 4

67

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

213
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

65

13%

LEVEL 2

227

45%

LEVEL 3

158

31%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 689

LEVEL 1

54

8%

LEVEL 2

324

47%

LEVEL 3

238

35%

LEVEL 4

73

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

222

46%

LEVEL 3

166

35%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

52

58%

LEVEL 2

34

38%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

44

63%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

305
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

92

13%

LEVEL 2

331

45%

LEVEL 3

235

32%

LEVEL 4

70

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

68

13%

LEVEL 2

229

44%

LEVEL 3

165

32%

LEVEL 4

54

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

27

54%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.