UDALL ROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

108

18%

LEVEL 2

289

48%

LEVEL 3

156

26%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

116

35%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

60

20%

LEVEL 2

147

48%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

142

49%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

94

17%

LEVEL 2

269

49%

LEVEL 3

142

26%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

104

36%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

250

51%

LEVEL 3

151

31%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

114

41%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

56

55%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

23

47%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

88

17%

LEVEL 2

252

49%

LEVEL 3

135

26%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

104

37%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

37

45%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

25

49%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.