COLD SPRING HARBOR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

514
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 951

LEVEL 1

103

11%

LEVEL 2

334

35%

LEVEL 3

353

37%

LEVEL 4

161

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

502
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 793

LEVEL 1

75

9%

LEVEL 2

216

27%

LEVEL 3

298

38%

LEVEL 4

204

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

236
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

57

12%

LEVEL 2

167

36%

LEVEL 3

173

38%

LEVEL 4

63

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

231
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

115

30%

LEVEL 3

151

40%

LEVEL 4

80

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

278
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

167

34%

LEVEL 3

180

37%

LEVEL 4

98

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

271
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

101

24%

LEVEL 3

147

36%

LEVEL 4

124

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

489
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 899

LEVEL 1

96

11%

LEVEL 2

314

35%

LEVEL 3

340

38%

LEVEL 4

149

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

460
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 730

LEVEL 1

68

9%

LEVEL 2

202

28%

LEVEL 3

272

37%

LEVEL 4

188

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

13

50%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

506
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 859

LEVEL 1

49

6%

LEVEL 2

304

35%

LEVEL 3

347

40%

LEVEL 4

159

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

492
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

23

3%

LEVEL 2

189

27%

LEVEL 3

291

41%

LEVEL 4

201

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

54

59%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

52

58%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

512
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 943

LEVEL 1

100

11%

LEVEL 2

331

35%

LEVEL 3

352

37%

LEVEL 4

160

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

500
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 788

LEVEL 1

74

9%

LEVEL 2

214

27%

LEVEL 3

298

38%

LEVEL 4

202

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.