Skip to Content
Main content

LLOYD HARBOR SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

137

34%

LEVEL 3

141

35%

LEVEL 4

83

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

135

38%

LEVEL 4

100

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

70

35%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

66

39%

LEVEL 4

41

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

59

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

138

36%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

126

38%

LEVEL 4

93

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

137

38%

LEVEL 4

81

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

80

25%

LEVEL 3

132

42%

LEVEL 4

97

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

18

47%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

23

68%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.