Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERT CUSHMAN MURPHY JR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

92

15%

LEVEL 2

256

41%

LEVEL 3

181

29%

LEVEL 4

91

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

142

38%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

132

44%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

50

16%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

37

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

15

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

80

15%

LEVEL 2

235

45%

LEVEL 3

156

30%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

227

43%

LEVEL 3

179

34%

LEVEL 4

90

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

131

41%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

58

64%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

32

67%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

267
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

244

41%

LEVEL 3

177

30%

LEVEL 4

90

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

131

38%

LEVEL 3

107

31%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.