AVOCA CENTRAL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

90

42%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

63

41%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

23

26%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

37

30%

LEVEL 2

54

44%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

38

41%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

57

28%

LEVEL 2

87

43%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

83

43%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

38

35%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

26

37%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

31

30%

LEVEL 2

52

51%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

37

45%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.