WATERLOO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 774

LEVEL 1

285

37%

LEVEL 2

343

44%

LEVEL 3

118

15%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

246

36%

LEVEL 2

264

39%

LEVEL 3

124

18%

LEVEL 4

44

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

126

34%

LEVEL 2

174

47%

LEVEL 3

60

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

114

34%

LEVEL 2

135

40%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

159

40%

LEVEL 2

169

42%

LEVEL 3

58

14%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

132

38%

LEVEL 2

129

38%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

253

36%

LEVEL 2

317

45%

LEVEL 3

105

15%

LEVEL 4

26

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

217

36%

LEVEL 2

240

39%

LEVEL 3

114

19%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

177

27%

LEVEL 2

325

50%

LEVEL 3

114

18%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

153

27%

LEVEL 2

242

43%

LEVEL 3

122

22%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

108

83%

LEVEL 2

18

14%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

93

79%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

115

28%

LEVEL 2

200

49%

LEVEL 3

78

19%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

96

30%

LEVEL 2

135

42%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

170

47%

LEVEL 2

143

39%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

150

42%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.