ODESSA-MONTOUR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

143

42%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

116

36%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

80

46%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

54

32%

LEVEL 2

74

44%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

76

46%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

62

41%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

140

43%

LEVEL 2

130

40%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

111

36%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

100

35%

LEVEL 2

134

46%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

119

46%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

43

90%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

51

88%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

61

36%

LEVEL 2

77

45%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

39

26%

LEVEL 2

66

44%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

82

49%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

77

46%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.