MIDDLEBURGH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

131

35%

LEVEL 2

165

44%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

96

32%

LEVEL 2

131

43%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

64

33%

LEVEL 2

90

46%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

45

28%

LEVEL 2

71

44%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

67

37%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

51

36%

LEVEL 2

60

43%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

125

35%

LEVEL 2

156

44%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

90

31%

LEVEL 2

122

43%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

73

25%

LEVEL 2

143

49%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

114

47%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

58

73%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

44

70%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

91

47%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

72

45%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

84

47%

LEVEL 2

74

41%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

61

43%

LEVEL 2

59

41%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.