Skip to Content
Main content

DUANESBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

115

29%

LEVEL 2

161

41%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

77

44%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

69

43%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

65

30%

LEVEL 2

84

39%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

43

22%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

105

29%

LEVEL 2

154

42%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

139

43%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

153

44%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

143

44%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

30

71%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

28

80%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

76

25%

LEVEL 2

129

42%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

116

41%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

39

47%

LEVEL 2

32

39%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

24

33%

LEVEL 2

32

44%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.