OLIVER W WINCH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 725

LEVEL 1

208

29%

LEVEL 2

354

49%

LEVEL 3

120

17%

LEVEL 4

43

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

169

27%

LEVEL 2

284

45%

LEVEL 3

119

19%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

173

49%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

77

26%

LEVEL 2

138

46%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

102

27%

LEVEL 2

181

48%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

92

28%

LEVEL 2

146

45%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

199

29%

LEVEL 2

341

49%

LEVEL 3

117

17%

LEVEL 4

41

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

158

27%

LEVEL 2

270

46%

LEVEL 3

115

19%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

11

69%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

138

22%

LEVEL 2

333

53%

LEVEL 3

119

19%

LEVEL 4

43

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

106

20%

LEVEL 2

260

49%

LEVEL 3

113

21%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

70

76%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

63

68%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

127

23%

LEVEL 2

272

50%

LEVEL 3

100

18%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

91

21%

LEVEL 2

193

45%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

81

44%

LEVEL 2

82

45%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

78

39%

LEVEL 2

91

46%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.