Skip to Content
Main content

NORWOOD-NORFOLK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

192

44%

LEVEL 2

166

38%

LEVEL 3

72

17%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

186

41%

LEVEL 2

186

41%

LEVEL 3

65

14%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

83

39%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

92

43%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

106

47%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

104

45%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

171

42%

LEVEL 2

158

39%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

169

41%

LEVEL 2

171

41%

LEVEL 3

63

15%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

139

37%

LEVEL 2

159

42%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

136

36%

LEVEL 2

172

45%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

53

88%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

50

75%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

83

43%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

96

52%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

135

55%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

143

54%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

78
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

188

44%

LEVEL 2

161

38%

LEVEL 3

72

17%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.