OGDENSBURG CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 717

LEVEL 1

283

39%

LEVEL 2

324

45%

LEVEL 3

89

12%

LEVEL 4

21

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 739

LEVEL 1

295

40%

LEVEL 2

257

35%

LEVEL 3

141

19%

LEVEL 4

46

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

129

38%

LEVEL 2

161

47%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

135

38%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

154

41%

LEVEL 2

163

43%

LEVEL 3

51

14%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

160

42%

LEVEL 2

132

34%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

273

39%

LEVEL 2

314

45%

LEVEL 3

86

12%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 724

LEVEL 1

288

40%

LEVEL 2

252

35%

LEVEL 3

139

19%

LEVEL 4

45

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

192

32%

LEVEL 2

305

50%

LEVEL 3

86

14%

LEVEL 4

21

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

200

32%

LEVEL 2

238

38%

LEVEL 3

139

22%

LEVEL 4

45

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

91

81%

LEVEL 2

19

17%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

95

81%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

129

49%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

85

27%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

208

46%

LEVEL 2

195

43%

LEVEL 3

42

9%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

210

49%

LEVEL 2

141

33%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

110
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 712

LEVEL 1

279

39%

LEVEL 2

323

45%

LEVEL 3

89

13%

LEVEL 4

21

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

184
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 730

LEVEL 1

291

40%

LEVEL 2

255

35%

LEVEL 3

138

19%

LEVEL 4

46

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.