Skip to Content
Main content

J WILLIAM LEARY JUNIOR HS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

190

41%

LEVEL 2

191

41%

LEVEL 3

70

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

121

35%

LEVEL 2

162

47%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

99

43%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

82

51%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

74

41%

LEVEL 2

80

44%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

32

44%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

22

42%

LEVEL 2

24

46%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

150

41%

LEVEL 2

154

42%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

97

35%

LEVEL 2

129

46%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

152

37%

LEVEL 2

183

44%

LEVEL 3

67

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

88

30%

LEVEL 2

151

51%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

38

78%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

33

73%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

95

47%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

77

51%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

135

52%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

88

46%

LEVEL 2

85

45%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.