Skip to Content
Main content

CANTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

175

31%

LEVEL 2

214

37%

LEVEL 3

138

24%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

129

24%

LEVEL 2

172

32%

LEVEL 3

153

28%

LEVEL 4

90

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

85

30%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

61

22%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

90

31%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

178
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

164

30%

LEVEL 2

207

38%

LEVEL 3

134

24%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

238
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

124

24%

LEVEL 2

162

31%

LEVEL 3

153

29%

LEVEL 4

85

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

102

21%

LEVEL 2

199

42%

LEVEL 3

132

28%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

151

34%

LEVEL 3

147

33%

LEVEL 4

87

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

73

78%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

65

68%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

73

21%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

111

32%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

77

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

102

45%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

78

39%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.