BRASHER FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

194

41%

LEVEL 2

191

40%

LEVEL 3

77

16%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

155

33%

LEVEL 2

184

39%

LEVEL 3

90

19%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

90

39%

LEVEL 2

102

44%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

94

42%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

104

43%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

93

38%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

172

40%

LEVEL 2

175

40%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

135

32%

LEVEL 2

169

39%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

162

38%

LEVEL 2

180

42%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

120

28%

LEVEL 2

173

41%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

32

70%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

35

73%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

89

45%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

140

50%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

109

41%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.