Skip to Content
Main content

SCHODACK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

105

24%

LEVEL 2

177

40%

LEVEL 3

122

28%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

154

39%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

53

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

57

28%

LEVEL 2

85

41%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

73

42%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

92

22%

LEVEL 2

165

40%

LEVEL 3

117

29%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

69

19%

LEVEL 2

144

40%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

164

45%

LEVEL 3

118

32%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

59

78%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

46

69%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

77

21%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

112

30%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

96

31%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

28

41%

LEVEL 2

28

41%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

29

36%

LEVEL 2

39

48%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.