Skip to Content
Main content

HOOSIC VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

107

27%

LEVEL 2

182

45%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

115

29%

LEVEL 2

174

44%

LEVEL 3

80

20%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

90

44%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

56

29%

LEVEL 2

83

43%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

57

29%

LEVEL 2

92

47%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

91

44%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

105

27%

LEVEL 2

178

45%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

110

29%

LEVEL 2

170

44%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

174

48%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

78

23%

LEVEL 2

161

47%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

33

79%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

37

71%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

131

46%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

111

42%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

45

38%

LEVEL 2

51

44%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

47

36%

LEVEL 2

63

48%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.