Skip to Content
Main content

HOOSICK FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

165

31%

LEVEL 2

236

44%

LEVEL 3

104

20%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

128

25%

LEVEL 2

224

44%

LEVEL 3

113

22%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

84

30%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

124

46%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

81

33%

LEVEL 2

113

45%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

68

29%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

147

29%

LEVEL 2

227

45%

LEVEL 3

103

20%

LEVEL 4

27

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

108

23%

LEVEL 2

214

46%

LEVEL 3

108

23%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

120

26%

LEVEL 2

211

46%

LEVEL 3

100

22%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

87

20%

LEVEL 2

205

47%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

45

61%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

41

60%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

132

43%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

118

43%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

92

41%

LEVEL 2

104

46%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

76

33%

LEVEL 2

106

46%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.