OTEGO-UNADILLA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

194

43%

LEVEL 2

177

39%

LEVEL 3

65

14%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

171

43%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

65

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

90

45%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

73

40%

LEVEL 2

80

43%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

104

42%

LEVEL 2

98

39%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

98

46%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

176

42%

LEVEL 2

168

40%

LEVEL 3

57

14%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

153

42%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

133

35%

LEVEL 2

171

45%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

138

43%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

61

87%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

65

86%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

90

44%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

70

41%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

127

52%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

110

49%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.