Skip to Content
Main content

STATE STREET INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

69

21%

LEVEL 3

132

40%

LEVEL 4

95

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

63

41%

LEVEL 4

37

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

69

40%

LEVEL 4

58

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

6

75%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

67

22%

LEVEL 3

124

40%

LEVEL 4

90

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

100

34%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

129

42%

LEVEL 4

94

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

221
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

127

43%

LEVEL 4

94

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.