SKANEATELES CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

91

13%

LEVEL 2

272

40%

LEVEL 3

245

36%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

370
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

65

11%

LEVEL 2

167

28%

LEVEL 3

226

38%

LEVEL 4

144

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

147

44%

LEVEL 3

119

36%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

109

38%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

176
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

126

35%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

197
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

80

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

315
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

86

13%

LEVEL 2

263

40%

LEVEL 3

237

36%

LEVEL 4

78

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

353
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

164

28%

LEVEL 3

215

37%

LEVEL 4

138

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

64

10%

LEVEL 2

262

40%

LEVEL 3

244

38%

LEVEL 4

79

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

364
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

160

28%

LEVEL 3

221

39%

LEVEL 4

143

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

27

69%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

23

64%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

325
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

89

13%

LEVEL 2

269

39%

LEVEL 3

245

36%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

356
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

142

26%

LEVEL 3

215

40%

LEVEL 4

141

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

19

33%

LEVEL 2

25

43%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.